Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 02:19

Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Asian Stocks Start Cautious, Dollar Holds Drop: Markets Wrap - Bloomberg
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Will ChatGPT make Quora obsolete?
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
SpaceX launches human remains, reentry capsules and more on Transporter 14 rideshare mission - Space
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Wall Street warns Trump aides the GOP tax bill could jolt bond markets - The Washington Post
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What Happens to Your Blood Pressure When You Drink Energy Drinks Every Day? - Verywell Health
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Can you tell me a depressing story?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.